Theory of Everything
 

Welcome to the Theory of Everything discussion community guest, we hope you will enjoy your visit :)

Joining our free community you will give you access to post topics, start your own Blog, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

theory of everything
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Debate Everything > Claymath Millennium Problems Discussion
Forum Home Theory of Everything (TOE) Link To Us Register Blogs Mark Forums Read

The Poincaré Conjecture

Claymath Millennium Problems Discussion


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-26-2008, 01:26 PM   #1 - Top
Pro
Admin/Founder
 
Pro's Avatar

 
Info
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: England
Posts: 525
Blog Entries: 8

Default The Poincaré Conjecture

The Poincaré Conjecture.














Pro - Administrator and Forum Founder



Still searching for falsity content within Pro Theory


Pro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 06:39 PM   #2 - Top
Pro
Admin/Founder
 
Pro's Avatar

 
Info
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: England
Posts: 525
Blog Entries: 8

Default Re: The Poincaré Conjecture

It's pretty much impossible for me to rewrite the protheory.com topics in full as I'd end up just making it too complicated so for now please just take a look at this original archive from my website and then you can ask me any questions below here

The Poincaré Conjecture



Introduction

This problem concerns the equations that are thought to govern a three dimensional sphere, and the mathematical properties that define its characteristics.



Field

The Poincaré conjecture is a problem from the field of topology.



Study

Topology is the study of the properties of a given object after certain applied events.



Events

These events may be mathematically twisting, stretching, or otherwise deforming a given object, though tearing is not allowed.



Apple

If you imagine stretching a rubber band around an apple, it is theoretically possible to slowly shrink it to a point without breaking it or the apple.



Doughnut

The opposite example is the same idea but using a doughnut instead of an apple.



Previous

The previous result is not possible so the opposite occurs.



Connectivity

This principle of opposite properties became known as simple connectivity.



Surface

The surface of the apple is said to be simply connected, and the surface of the doughnut is not.



Sphere

Topologically speaking, a two dimensional sphere is thought to be governed by the property of simple connectivity.



Manifold

Poincaré asked whether or not the three dimensional sphere is characterized as the unique simply connected three manifold.



Relation

He wanted to solve the equations that define the same mathematical property in relation to a three dimensional sphere, but was unable to provide a singular answer.



Summary

Is a three dimensional sphere simply connected or not?

Poincaré assumed that it was at first but he was unable to prove it.



The Millennium Problem

The Millennium problem is to prove whether or not the Poincaré conjecture is correct, and to fully explain this principle of simple connectivity in relation to a three dimensional sphere.

For the exact problem description please refer to Claymath.org



The Answer



Conjecture

The Poincaré conjecture presents us with two options, either a three dimensional sphere is simply connected or it is not, and asks us to choose one of them.



Dimensional

The concept of simple connectivity seems to work for a two dimensional example because the outcome is restricted to two possible opposites.

1. Simply connected.

2. Not simply connected.



Restricted

The rules change when considering three dimensions because instead of being restricted to only two potential answers, we are now restricted to three potential answers, no more and no less.



Combination

A three dimensional sphere may still be simply connected or not, as it was in the two dimensional answer, but now it may also be a simultaneous combination of the two.



Answers

Three simultaneous dimensions require three simultaneous answers in the same way that all other answers to all other questions do.



Simply

A three dimensional sphere may be simply connected, not simply connected, and neutral.

Simultaneously.



Conjecture

1. The Poincaré conjecture is true.

2. The Poincaré conjecture is false.

3. The Poincaré conjecture is neutral.

Simultaneously.



Am I wrong?

I simultaneously oppose, agree with, and neutralise all criticism ad infinitum.

My point is literal.

There is no point creating a theory of everything that doesn't work.














Pro - Administrator and Forum Founder



Still searching for falsity content within Pro Theory


Pro is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.


Theory of Everything