String Theory

[Pro]

String Theory.

[Pro]

It's pretty much impossible for me to rewrite the protheory.com topics in full as I'd end up just making it too complicated so for now please just take a look at this original archive from my website and then you can ask me any questions below here

String theory



Introduction

This theory describes the universe as an infinite collection of vibrating loops known as strings.

All universal forces and interactions are thought to be a result of these vibrations within all matter.



Attempt

String theory is an attempt at a theory of everything.



Vibrating

It basically states that everything in the universe is made of tiny vibrating strings.



Strings

The main assumption of this theory is that strings may be infinitely large or small and it is suggested that they create the universe and everything (all interactions) within it.



Object

One particular object might be described as a string vibrating one way, and another object might be described as a string vibrating another way.



Account

The concept of these vibrating loops is thought to account for the basic principle of change that the universe exhibits, the inherent potential found within all matter.



Magnify

String theory suggests that if it were somehow possible to infinitely magnify the particles and forces that we currently observe, we would find that they are composed of one dimensional vibrating loops.



Combinations

Combinations of these strings are thought to overlap each other and this process is thought to create the theoretical potential for loops in time and space.



Dimensions

String theory describes many (possibly infinite) dimensions.



Summary

Everything is made of infinitely large or small strings.

Strings may overlap each other.

All interactions between matter are thought to be explained as strings vibrating.



The Problem

Is string theory accurate as a theory of everything?



The Answer



Relative

String theory makes a number of relative assumptions that cannot be ultimately relied upon as unchanging constants.



String

The theory itself relies on the shape of a "string" for example, which is too specific to be a complete description of the potentials within the universe as it is singular.



Opposites

This singular description doesn't account for the opposite and neutral potentials within itself and it is therefore not completely accurate.



Technology

To be able to see these strings it is assumed that we need some sort of new and powerful technology, capable of infinite magnification.



Everything

A theory of everything should not need to assume anything further than the relative existence of its own self.



Deeper

A theory of everything should not need to rely on a deeper explanatory base, or need to project some sort of "shape" or other relative definition upon the universe in order to explain and understand it truthfully.



Beyond

Everything is a simultaneous loop of three possible potentials beyond description by words.



Is String theory a theory of everything?

1. String theory is a theory of everything.

2. String theory is not a theory of everything.

3. There is a neutral possibility.

Simultaneously.



Am I wrong?

I simultaneously oppose, agree with, and neutralise all criticism ad infinitum.

My point is literal.

There is no point creating a theory of everything that doesn't work.

[unvsrlprncpllaw]

We are ever thinking in "mass “terms.”. These strings are not "mass' strings, rather light energy cones. The vibration occurs due to the light Photon colliding with the M-surface( thus producing; playing, animating; resonating the "mass" being into existentialism). Light is NOT string until first it collides with this ETHER-ORE(either or) "platform/plane(M). Light is free and uninhibited( constant C-speed) so long as it is NOT relative to the M-plane. The light ever flows and expands as distance from the light source is increased. It is non-geometric; non-looped, non-stringed so long as M-relativity is absent. However when the light collides at the M-field("gravity"...singularity of E+photon with E- 'dual form') then "at this "place in space time" the one end of the light cone( origin of photon in space time) begins to interact with the other end of the light cone( by means of M existence relative to E+ light photon). This other end represents the mc (e-) end.
Imagine if you will a light shining from a flashlight. The light represents a ray ('triangular': apex to 'base' ..always expanding away from the source). If you were inside the path of this light you would representatively be inside a spatial 'tube of light.' If you were at the "base of this light looking toward the origin flashlight, factoring in distance ,the light “cone”" would appear to be a 'hollow tunnel.' At this point it is not a string that can be "plucked" because it has no end point( point two.) However if the light collided with M-field it would now be halted at that place and the M-field would represent the other end of the string...as well the M-plane would be the wave(vibration) phenomenon that is interacting( verses kinetic=E+photon) with the Photon from point one.
E=M(mc)"2". M=Universal Principle Law. M= Photon(point "A"= E+) ..kinetic; x Interactive (point b= E-) "abridgement". Thus M= singularity point embodying the duality of E+ as to E-. M= The horizon point. M= grey matter ETHER ORE. M= E+-E- relativity. M= "gravity" illusory. M= " Illusory C2". M= ("mass")=E(invisible space light energy). M is what explains the reality that E+ and E- are "sharing the same place in space time" whether separated by one inch or billions of light years. The farther E+ photon is from M(mc"2") the less the potential conversion from "mass"(M) to energy(E+). The closer E+ is to M-plane the more potential for "mass" to convert to E+( or; for E+=1/2x1/2(duality)...to become 'again' E+=whole(singular). E+ photon is innately existential. E-( as to E+; by means of M-relativity) is "INHERENTLY" existential. E=M(mc)"2"

[unvsrlprncpllaw]

Everything in the universe is made up of "invisible space ENERGY"...light= EL+EYE+GANT! However this Invisible energy/light is only perceived when it is communicated to an M-ETHER plane. Thus what may be viewed as tiny relative to our eyes ability to magnify light photons and produce an "image", may to other existentials be gigantic. Thus strings can either be miniscule or vastly large. This takes into consideration the relativity principles of Einstein. Therefore if I am sitting on a bench watching a car drive toward me that is a mile away the car looks relatively small. However if that car reaches my relative position and passes me I then relatively observe that the car is "larger. All the while I am sipping my drink and the straw(string-tube) appears to my relative eye to be rather small. However the ant that is crawling up the inside of the straw reasons this would be a nice area to "live in for a while.' This takes into consideration Extra-dimensions that can either be small or large yet sharing the same space as we are though not perceived( invisible space energy...verses our "mass" eye which is equally Invisible space energy geometrically perceived due to UPL+ Universal Principle Law= M( Non-membrane though illusory implied in principle).
Thus Strings (light cones that only become strings when M is relative to light path and becomes the second "END" of the string as well results in the interactive wave phenomenon...SOUND!) can be demonstratively microscopic( accommodating the principles of TOE) or Gigantic (though unperceived....yet all around us. SOUND STRANGE? Consider the word string phonetically.
ST+ARE+EYE+NG....strange...IS(s)..IS="to be". As well the last three letters in the word string is ing= I+IN+GE...ENERGY. STAR (light) RINGS(are energy). When you look out at the stars one of them might be...just maybe..the exact Photon(one end of the string) that is kinetically interacting with its "other end" earth. The one end is the light origin(photon) the other end is the 'M-plane earth" other end. The M(mc=earth) is sharing the energy in vestige of Photon. Demonstratively they are "sharing the same place in space time" as well the one is affording the energy the other is receiving and utilizing it(residually). The rest of the energy of the Photon is considerately passing through and beyond the M-plane=(mc=earth) and communicating its light energy to either other M-planes in the relative path of the "bulk of light of photon; or: freely flowing in the "SPACE" (IS="to be"..Pace) around and beyond myriad plane(s) plethoric dimesion(infinite dimension).
These things must be explained and defined in chronological order relative to the gradual discovering of them. I do not intend to usurp others ideas...merely contribute to the search for those principle laws that if discovered would enhance mans knowledge and scientific advancement. However I feel it is appropriate to respond...respectfully and with the absence of condescension; to the postulates (unique and stimulating) stated in this PROTHEORY forum. I would like to elaborate further on the basic precepts alluded to above( relative to string theory) however I will reserve the desire to do so to a time when I am satisfied with the originator of this site acquiescing. In the shared and perhaps collaborative "interests of science."